Constructivist Learning Theory,
Teaching, and Learning
According
to Guzdial (2018), the constructivists learning theory states students
construct their meaning in learning. It uses interactive strategies to create
meaningful contexts that help students make meaning for their learning. Inquiry-based, problem-based, and cooperative
learning are all learning strategies that incorporate the ideals of
constructivist learning (Kurt, 2021).
Technology
is an excellent way to provide students with a learning environment that can
bring meaning to their learning (Noel, 2015).
Noel also notes that blogging is one example of how technology can
facilitate meaningful learning in the constructivist learning environment. However, constructionism, while based on the
theory of constructivism, focused on the fact that students learn more when
they construct something like an artifact.
Like constructivism, constructionism believes that learning must be
meaningful.
Additionally,
constructionism values the use of technology. Constructionists see technology
as a laboratory for self-expression and provide a workspace to create (Stager,
2001). Examples of technology in constructionism are programming video games,
video editing, and producing films. It
is essential to understand that the two, constructionism and constructivism are
similar and encourage active learning meaningful to the learner.
While
learning must be meaningful, I frequently use constructionism in the learning
environment. Currently, I have students create evidence of their learning. When
learning about the geography of the Caribbean, my 8th graders
created group websites identifying and describing the physical attributes of
four islands of their choice. They also included in their website a page that analyzed
and made comparisons and contrasts between Bermuda and the islands they
selected. They then posted the link to
their sites on the class discussion board for others to view, share and
discuss. In another class, my 7th graders created a radio interview
with a pretend witness of the great pilgrimage of Mansa Musa of the Mali
Empire. They had to explain what they saw and what they heard.
Additionally,
they had to explain how this pilgrimage had impacted their impression of the
Mali Empire. In each case, students were
empowered as learners to construct evidence of their learning and be creative
communicators, and global communicators as the ISTE Standards for Students
indicated are essential for students to do (ISTE Standards: Students, 2016b).
The ISTE Standards for Educators (2016a) state that teachers must support
student empowerment. Also, they should
design authentic, learner-driven activities while facilitating learning with
technology, allowing students to create radio interviews and websites, which
will benefit students in the long run and empower them to be masters of their
own learning experience.
The
popular Source that I found helpful in my understanding of constructivism was Use a Learning Theory: Constructivism
((BlueSofaMedia, 2012). It helped me to understand what constructivism is. I would use this video to help guide how I
plan for my Genius Hour activities. I plan to encourage students to seek real-world
problems to solve and display evidence of their learning. Additionally, I will
consider if learning promotes higher-level thinking skills and collaborative
work when possible.
The
scholarly article that I found was Using
blogs to create a constructivist learning environment (Noel, 2015). It was meaningful and relevant as it helped
me see how technology can be used in the constructivist learning environment.
As my students engage in the Genius Hour, I will reflect on how a blog is a
great way to express learning. Having a blog is an excellent way to encourage higher-level
thinking skills and work in a meaningful and relevant manner to individual
student learning.
I
also found a blog source on constructivism called Research-Based Theories and
Models, part 1 - constructivism (Phenomenal Science Leadership Team, 2017).
This blog will help guide me as I guide my students by remembering that constructivism
is student-centered and what this kind of learning environment is not.
Constructivism/
constructionism is valuable to the learning experience of students. They incorporate
meaningful learning and focus on students being the center of the experience. They
can effectively use their higher-level thinking skills to learn and create
evidence of their learning.
References
BlueSofaMedia. (2012, December
31). Use a Learning Theory: Constructivism. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xa59prZC5gA
Guzdial, M. (2018, March 19). Constructivism
vs. Constructivism vs. Constructionism | Computing Education Research Blog.
Computing Education Research Blog; https://www.facebook.com/WordPresscom. https://computinged.wordpress.com/2018/03/19/constructivism-vs-constructivism-vs-constructionism/
International Society for
Technology in Education (ISTE). (2016a). ISTE Standards: Educators. ISTE.
We Are ISTE | ISTE. https://www.iste.org/standards/iste-standards-for-teachers
International Society for
Technology in Education (ISTE). (2016b). ISTE Standards: Students. ISTE.
We Are ISTE | ISTE. https://www.iste.org/standards/iste-standards-for-students
Kurt, Dr. S. (2021, February 21).
Constructivist Learning Theory - Educational Technology. Educational
Technology. https://educationaltechnology.net/constructivist-learning-theory/
Noel, L. (2015). Using blogs
to create a constructivist learning environment. Procedia - Social and
Behavioral Sciences.
Phenomenal Science Leadership
Team. (2017). Constructivism - phenomenal science k-5 curriculum.
Phenomenal Science K-5 Curriculum. http://phenomscience.weebly.com/blog/constructivism
Stager, G. S. (2001). Constructionism
as a high-tech intervention strategy for at-risk learners. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED462949.pdf
Comments
Post a Comment